Why attack Libya?

The Shameful reason …why …

By  WJ Anthony

During the past several weeks, the world saw NATO, the US, France and Britain attack the nation of Libya with bombs, rockets, and incendiaries, fired from aircraft and naval ships of all sorts on the pretext that they were responding to request of the rebels in eastern Libya who had attacked the government of Libya and soon were in danger of defeat from the Libyan military which opposed the rebel attempt to overthrow the government of Libya in the eastern part of Libya.  Rebel leaders were backed by the NATO clique, which used the media to vilify Ghadaffi, as a dictator, who would not allow the rebels to set up a different government in Libya.

Facts soon revealed that Britain had quietly moved hundreds of British military Special Forces and intelligence agents into the eastern cities of Libya to organize rebels in an offensive to overthrow the Libyan government in Tripoli.  The government leaders of Britain, France and the US proposed a UN Security Council resolution to declare a no fly zone over the eastern part of Libya where the rebels were gathered.

The no fly zone allowed the US, France and Britain to bomb and destroy Libya’s military rout of the rebels in Libya’s eastern cities.  The no fly zone was used by France, Britain and the US to use aircraft to bomb hospitals, residential homes and people in Tripoli and other areas to create chaos in Libya and cause the people to force Ghadaffi to abandon his office.  The no fly zone enabled the NATO scheme to drop bombs and radioactive materials on the civilian infrastructure.

Despite the UN resolution, NATO’s three rulers violated international law.  They met a strong opposition by the people of Libya and other countries of the world, who opposed the violent resolution as a solution for the rebellion.  The three rulers expected support from Arab and other countries, but it didn’t happen, leaving the British, Sarkozy and Obama with a loss of face.  Obama was disrobed from his pose a genuine Nobel Peace Prize winner, when he ordered US ships, marines and Air Forces to position themselves along the coast of Libya and be ready to launch an invasion.

Why did the three countries choose to attack Libya with air strikes and bombings of Libyan infrastructure and claim that Ghadaffi had to resign?  What was their real intent?  Did the Libyan government deprive its people of something?  Was the real intent, of the NATO cabal, a plan to acquire the control of the vast oil and water resources of Libya?  Was Libya selfish with its oil?  Not so!  Libya had been selling oil to Europe, China and other countries, even the US until the US forbid any Libyan oil to be imported to the US.

Recently a group of Russian doctors and medical professionals, who had served in Libya from 2 years to 20 years, issued an open letter to Vladimir Putin and Dimitri Medvedev, the leaders of Russia.  The letter explained that the Russians, living in Libya, had expected the Russian government to use its Security Council Veto to defeat the No Fly Zone resolution, but the Russian government surprisingly abstained from the vote, allowing the US, France and Britain to militarily support the rebel attack against Libya’s Government.

Obama publicly demanded that Ghadaffi resign and allow the rebels to organize their government for Libya.  A media analyst asked for a comparison, did Obama, Sarkozy, or the British ever require Israel to do the same thing with the Palestinians?

Could there be another reason for NATO’s plot, more important than oil, that is the reason why the US, France and Britain wanted to topple Ghadaffi from ruling Libya?

The Open Letter by the Russian medical teams, who serve in Libya, explained a fact that deserves our attention.  It reveals the reason why the new World Order mentors decided to order France, Britain and the US to attack Libya.

The Open Letter accused the rebels in wanting to overthrow a society that was supported by the people of Libya.  The mentors of NATO wanted a specific change in Libya, something that would not naturally happen.  The Open Letter stated:

“We are Ukrainians, Russians and Belarusians, the people of various professions (mainly doctors), working in Libya for more than a year (from 2 to 20 years). During this time, we became well acquainted with the life of the Libyan people and state with few citizens of other nations living in this social comfort, as the Libyans. They are entitled to free treatment, and their hospitals provide the best in the world of medical equipment.

“Education in Libya is free, capable young people have the opportunity to study abroad at government expense. When marrying, young couples receive 60,000 Libyan dinars (about 50,000 U.S. dollars) of financial assistance.

“Non-interest state loans, and as practice shows, undated. Due to government subsidies the price of cars is much lower than in Europe, and they are affordable for every family. Gasoline and bread cost a penny, no taxes for those who are engaged in agriculture.

“The Libyan people are quiet and peaceful, are not inclined to drink, and are very religious. Today, the people are suffering. In February, the peaceful life of the people was violated by gangs of criminals and insane drugged youth – whom the Western media said were “peaceful demonstrators”. They used weapons and attacked police stations, government agencies, military units – resulting in bloodshed. Those who direct them, pursue a clear objective – to create chaos and establish control over Libya’s oil. They misinformed the international community, and said that the Libyans are struggling against the regime. Tell us, who would not like such a regime? If such a regime were in Ukraine or Russia, we would not have been here and worked and enjoyed the social comfort at home in our own countries and in every possible way such a regime would be maintained.”

Was the high standard of living, which people of Libya enjoyed, the reason for the attack?

The Doctors’ letter said the people of Libya enjoyed a standard that surpassed what the Russians enjoyed during the socialism era of the Soviet Union.

Look at their words again:  “During this time, we became well acquainted with the life of the Libyan people and state with few citizens of other nations living in this social comfort, as the Libyans.”  Those words of the doctors told us that the people of Libya enjoyed a standard of living that few people in other nations of the world were able to enjoy, and the doctors listed some of the things that even the Soviet Union was not able to provide their citizens.

What could the rulers of NATO, Britain, France, and the US expect would happen, if the People of France, Britain and the US were to realize and insist that they have the right to enjoy the same good things to pursue life and happiness, as the Libyans enjoy?

Would the French, British and US people cause trouble or rebel against the leaders and wealthy of those countries, who have caused the people to lose their jobs and incomes and homes?   Without jobs in a money-based society, poor unemployed people become desperate, and the rulers of wealth know they can create poverty to induce poor men to try to survive by joining the military as mercenary troops in the wars that rulers use to attack and control or destroy the governments of other nations, as they do now and have done in the past with Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Vietnam, Africa, Mexico, Cuba, Nicaragua, Korea, Japan, China, Russia, etc., etc.

If the impressive example of Libya’s standard of living became known to most people in the world, the new World Order mentors, who control Britain, France and the US, would be confronted by people everywhere, demanding their right to pursue the standard of living that Libyans enjoy.

That would require NATO countries to change and provide people with the safety to appropriately pursue their lives in happiness.

The rulers of wealth don’t want to change and lose their power to dominate the people and have chosen to destroy Libya’s example, as their present high priority.  Libya’s standard of living threatens only the powerful rulers of wealth.

The perverted rulers of wealth, have ordered the leaders of the former and present colonial powers – France, Britain and the US to destroy or domesticate Muomar Ghadaffi, because the strategy of the vision that Ghadaffi developed, successfully accomplished the resource and trade development that built Libya’s thriving society.  The oligarchy of wealth does not want that example to attract converts.

Almost any American, who understands the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, would recognize that Ghadaffi designed Libya’s industrial development and investment policies to secure the rights of Libya’s people to pursue the happiness of life.  Jefferson said, in the Declaration, that is what government is supposed to do.

Ghadaffi developed the infrastructure of education, technology, research, community wellbeing, and financial investment in water and oil resources to earn income that would build Libya’s economy and independence as a nation, to serve the unalienable rights of its people.

The Declaration said not a word about using money to accomplish the unalienable rights of people.  Ghadaffi and the people of Libya know that money determines most of the arrangements of life on the Earth at the present time.  Libya arranged money to serve the unalienable rights of Libyan people to housing, healthcare, education, interest free loans, and startup gifts to newly-wed people.

Why were the rebels, who were Libyan youth, misled and manipulated to believe that violence was an appropriate way to change what they didn’t like in Libya?  The Russian doctors said in their Open Letter, that most of the rebels were discontented drug addicts or criminals.

Drugs have been used to pervert and destroy the best of humans and entire countries.  Who controls the drug trade?  Government officials of the US and other countries have been implicated at the high levels of government power to use drugs to wage the destruction of societies and cultures.  One example is the British conquest of China with the Opium War.

If the young rebels in Libya would have read the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, they might have understood this passage:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.  That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.  Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.  But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Were the young Libyan rebels unjustifiably denied their unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?  What did they consider to be happiness?  Did they enjoy a standard of living that the Russian doctors said was available in Libya?  Did they pursue and complete the education they wanted?  Were they able to obtain appropriate housing, free medical care, food, interest-free loans to accomplish an appropriate career?  The Russian doctors said those opportunities were available to Libyan people.

Libya’s society and government have been under a form of siege because of its revolutionary origin, but Libya fulfilled the basic services that Governments are designed to achieve.  Libyan people obtained opportunities from Government to pursue their unalienable rights.  The Government enabled Libyan people to pursue happiness, through education and employment.  That was inferred in the Declaration of Independence in 1776 in the words of its second paragraph.  Free health care and higher education, interest-free loans by the Government to the people for housing, would fit the vision of the Declaration’s words.

Only a few of the American people and the people of France and Britain are aware of the meaning of the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.  An appropriate standard of living is inferred as an unalienable right.  If Americans, French and British people understood that meaning and compared their standard of living with that of Libya, would Americans, French and British people feel that they were deliberately deprived?  Would their outlook of life then change?  Would they think about why their rulers haven’t provided their people with the opportunities that Libyans have enjoyed?

Nowadays, the Internet could be a vehicle for appropriate change by informing people about their rights.  Like a seed that is sown to grow, might people in France, Britain, and the United States of America soon demand changes from the presidents and premiers who rule those countries?  But, those officials know that they have been given their positions by the money of the wealthy.  Do they know that they must rule government to favor the wealthy and protect their advantages with war and violence, if necessary?  Have such rulers always done that to people in other countries throughout history?  Are they now trying to accomplish that in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, and in Mexico?

Was the order to destroy Libya’s example, the top priority given to the rulers who serve the wealthy, because Libya might lead to the Government that was described in the Declaration of Independence?  Was the Declaration the ‘stone’ that the wealthy, slaveholding, Masonic builders of the new World Order rejected, as was predicted to arise in North America?  Were the builders obliged to choose only one master?  Would they choose the Creator, who endowed all humans with unalienable rights, as was mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, or would ‘the builders’ choose mammon?   Thirteen years later, mammon became the only ruler of the US Constitution and the ruler of the nation that it governs to this day.

Ghadaffi has publicly often said that he favored the establishment of The United States of Africa.  He has been an important mentor for the African Union.  Did the second paragraph of the Declaration persuade Ghadaffi to see the former King of Libya as a Despot and did that convince Ghadaffi to throw off the tyranny of the king in a bloodless revolution?   Did the Declaration inspire Ghadaffi with a vision to institute a new Government for Libya?

Did Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address inspire Ghadaffi with the zeal to build in Libya the Government that Thomas Jefferson suggested in the Declaration of Independence?

“. . . that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. . . and that government of the people. . .by the people. . .for the people. . . shall not perish from the earth. “

“Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

“What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light; and what you hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops.”   Matthew10:26-27

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.